Sunday, October 30, 2011

Let The Non Swimmers Drown-The Coalition's Approach to Domestic Violence

Introduction


The Guardian has published bad news for that will reduce access to legal aid for targets of Domestic Violence.



 http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/oct/30/female-domestic-violence-victims-lose-out-in-legal-reforms

We offer Awareness Raising programmes to the Public and Private Sectors-feedback from our programmes has been exceptionally positive: we base them on verifiable information that is delivered in a direct "no frills" manner, allowing the power of the information to create the impact.
Participants aren't wilfully ignorant however it remains pretty clear to me that unless you are
  • A target of domestic violence and abuse
  • A friend or relative of a target
  • A support worker or other professional
it is less than likely that you'll have a picture of the reality for the 3 million women per year (UK) whose lives are blighted by an abusive relationship. It doesn't stop with the target: children too are adversely affected with well researched impacts on their educational and emotional growth.
I wonder what questions the decision makers asked themselves: here are some from one of our training packages

(a)   How do perpetrators isolate women? How do perpetrators make women feel unable to do anything right through enforced trivial demands thus taking away their confidence in believing that they can make a change for the better
(b)   How do perpetrators degrade women, what threats might a perpetrator use? Well, one of the ways is to make the financially invisible and therefore almost completely dependent.
(c)    How might a perpetrator display total power by showing who is in control? What small “nice things and treats” might constitute occasional indulgences? Total financial control equals total power. The occasional indulgence? More power and control
(d)   How are women kept physically and emotionally exhausted by perpetrators? What distorted perspectives might a perpetrator use to justify his behaviour? There are as many as there are perpetrators and targets-what we know is that the collective impact of the behaviour is to take away the individual's capacity to believe that they can break out of the relationship and begin a new life under the protection of the law
And it's my belief that unless you are asking these questions and plenty more you are not going to understand the impact of a decision that restricts access to legal aid and support at a critical time.
They might also want to ask
How might perpetrators use children to increase their control and decrease the resistance of the target? How might they use children to:
    1. Humiliate
    2. Force compliance
    3. Ensure silence is maintained
    4. Force a woman to stay in an abusive relationship
and that often the resolution of such complex issues requires the force of law.

Is it that they do not understand that impoverishment is part of the abuse and that the target may be effectively without any means of support at and beyond the point of leaving?


This is a poorly thought out decision that requires challenging in a very public forum. There is, as far as I can ascertain, no evidence of alternative funding streams. A disgrace.



Tuesday, October 11, 2011


Last Month Coady Consultants made significant progress in the way our training is delivered by recording some audio tracks and asking the trainees to respond to them. While this sort of thing is not unknown, it is the first time the company has tried something like this and we really were going out on a limb in order to make it work. Here’s how it all happened:

"Reflective In The Studio"



One of our clients has us involved with a project called Dignity At Work, where if somebody is having a problem at work with, for instance, their colleagues, or procedures that don’t fit their comfortable work patterns, they can call a Dignity At Work advisor who can advise on what to do, which procedures to follow, who to talk too etc. The project has been live for several months now, and though it has been useful when it has been used, the feedback that we received from our training sessions gave the impression that the team were becoming disillusioned with the lack of calls they were receiving. It is difficult, therefore, for development as an advisor to come with experience, so the group meets up every so often, typically 3-4 months, to discuss progress and how to move forward to deliver a better service. In response to this, Coady Consultants took the step of devising a way to deliver some training that would give the team some experience and knowledge of dealing with issues that might arise in their role.

The initial idea was to conduct the training in the form of a ‘role-play’ scenario; however this was not well received. Role play is a challenge which not all the members of the team were willing to accept, and it would be difficult to construe what was happening in the role play as a ‘realistic scenario.’ John Dooner then came up with the idea of doing it as an audio recording, and called me in to a meeting room to brainstorm the idea…

The project started off with John suggesting that I write ‘radio playlet’ scripts for the audio tracks that eventually became the sound project. This was something I was more than happy to take on; creative writing is something I really enjoy doing! Then we brainstormed ideas on how we might get these scripts in to a presentable form for delivering training. The suggestions went from recording it into a mobile phone – not a popular one for presentation – to hiring actors, recording studios, equipment, engineers and doing a massive production job. I must admit at this point I was feeling somewhat incredulous about all this; it sounded like a great idea but it also sounded like one of those things that sounds great when you’re talking about it, but when it comes down to actually doing it the whole thing becomes too mad, breaks down around you and you just get on with the mundane activities that keep your life ticking over. But then again, through my experience as a musician I’ve had experience in dealing with recording studios, I know some actors, or at least some people who could do it, and as I have said, I enjoy writing… there’s no reason why it shouldn’t work. So I took on the project, and threw myself in to what became one of the most challenging and enjoyable experiences of my employment.

The first step was to write the scripts. My brief was to come up with several different ways of how not to answer a call that you might get as a DAW Advisor, and a couple of good ones as well. We had chosen to base the tracks on a true story of a long-running piece of work we were in the process of completing. We changed the names and places, but I was writing about real things and real people with sensitive issues. We were always going to do this; it lends an extra layer of plausibility to the end result. But as with any piece of creative writing, it’s not going to work without some semblance of a plan, and I had to keep in mind that everything that happens in a call – what is said, how it is said, why, how it all ends etc – happens for a reason. I therefore set about coming up with a few scenarios for the complainant, Emily, based on four points during her sorry tale where she might have called a DAW advisor, if she had the opportunity. I did the same thing for scenarios that somebody who works in an office might find themselves in which might be reflected in their mood and how they deal with the call, e.g. the end of a long day, just come out of a disciplinary hearing, in the middle of a meeting, bright and enthusiastic. It was then a case of matching the two separate scenarios together, and writing the scripts around that.

The actual writing was easy after the initial planning stage. The fact that I have met the people on whom this story was based and know quite a bit about them meant that it was not hard to deduce what might be said and how an advisor might respond. One point discussed in the initial meeting that I was eager to get across was the fact that some people may be struggling with quite a complex set of emotions, and would have to make a terrific effort to convince themselves that it is worthwhile making a call. What that person doesn’t want is to be told that the advisor is too busy to talk to them, or that they think their problem is petty and below their attention. This was a matter that came up in discussions with the actors I eventually hired and the team to whom we delivered the training; the issues that Emily was calling with do seem quite petty and spiteful, playground stuff that shouldn’t really have found it’s way in to work. And yes, it was all that and more – but at Coady Consultants we feel that the fact that Emily had to deal with these problems, which also included a troubled personal history, on her own with little or no help from her employers, made a significant contribution to the damage it eventually caused.

Incidentally, one of the scripts was actually written about half an hour before the first and only rehearsal the actors had! This was due to some communication difficulties; my scripts had highlighted most of the pitfalls that DAW advisors might fall in to but not all, and it took a while before I was informed of what I had missed. Bearing in mind that I did not know from the outset exactly what ground to cover, getting 6 out of 7 correct is not bad at all, but I’d left out the idea of over-promising, so when I finally found this out I had to come up with a script for it very quickly. However, this wasn’t a problem; I came up with a generic script for Emily and an enthusiastic response from her DAW advisor and all was sorted out.

The next step was to hire three actors; a significant challenge. I could, had I wanted to, have found some booking agents and hired out professionals to do the job. A number of things stopped me from doing this, not least of which money. While I had been given no specific budget to work to, I knew roughly how much money we were making from the job itself, and I guessed that I wouldn’t be allowed to throw money around indiscriminately. Also, it was the first time I had tried to do something like this and I didn’t want to hire professional actors to do a job that I’m doing at – not an amateur level, but I would prefer if my actors came in with no expectations that I expect to fulfil. So I had to find my actors elsewhere. The plan was to go for Universities and Colleges; I’m all for giving young performers a chance and they wouldn’t necessarily be above working for a comparatively small amount of money.

The first one was easy enough: My old friend Katie Saunders, who I know to have a huge amount of talent anyway, had recently completed a degree in Drama at Aberystwyth University. Knowing the problems that many graduates find in looking for work after their degree, I guessed she would have no problem with taking on the role of Emily. I did inform her about exactly what had happened with Emily and why to enable her to get in to the role – but not before asking for a confidentiality agreement, remember we’re dealing with real people here!


Katie: Ready to record!













Kate actually found the next person: her old friend Guy Oliver, who I understand has also completed a similar degree and was very interested in the role as the DAW Advisor. John also asked me to find someone to play the part of a female DAW Advisor, and for this one I spoke to Andy Nicholls at Dudley College, asking if he had any Performing Arts students who would be interested in the role. A few days later I got a phone call from a young lady called Gabrielle Thomas, and the following week I drafted her in to the project after someone else pulled out of the role.

Guy, the right Guy for the role?





Finding the studio wasn’t difficult, but it was harder work than it should have been. I spent some time looking at websites for various studios to see about how much it would cost and whether it was equipped for purpose. I thanked my lucky stars that I’m working in an era where such information is available online; in the past I would either have had to make many phone calls and visits to find this sort of thing out, or book a studio and hope for the best having no idea what I was getting myself in to when I walk through the door! I narrowed it down to two candidates who fit the requirements, and chose the one closer to the Wolverhampton area where the actors and I live. Unfortunately they didn’t answer their phone once in six days, so I eventually went with Robannas in Birmingham, who were more than happy to have our business!



I then got the actors together for a rehearsal. I don’t know whether a rehearsal is usual in this sort of thing, but I got the idea from watching the DVD extras to Family Guy of all things. The voice actors all sit around a table with copies of the script and read out their parts as they come along. It was possible that the actors could have read their parts of the script in the studio without ever meeting one another. However, because of the way I am used to working with musicians, I am used to an environment where everybody contributes, so what you eventually hear is the combination of voices and scripts that we just wouldn’t have got by working individually. If there was sufficient time, money and inclination, I might have tried to arrange matters to take this idea forward. However, for this project, it was absolutely crucial that the actors had an idea of what the conversation with their counterparts was supposed to sound like, and I think we achieved that. In hindsight, I could have arranged it a little better – nobody knew where the office was, including me, so we were a bit late in getting started, I’d forgotten to print a script off for myself and ended up sharing Guys, and I’d had no lunch so I was starving hungry - but it served its purpose and it’s a step that I’m very glad we took.

The recording itself was the following Friday. That actually went quite smoothly. The three actors conducted themselves with great professionalism and gave stunning performances. I had over-booked the actors slightly; I had given them two hours each to record their parts but in practice most of it was done in less than an hour, and Guy managed his scripts in 30 minutes. That meant that there was a lot of downtime in between actors, however the engineer Slawek used this to our advantage by chopping up the separate lines which actually saved us a lot of time later. John turned up at some point to see what was going on; the actors had left by then but he filmed the inside of the studio to show people what we were doing.

The only slight problem we encountered was that we had no ambient background track to use. This was something that simply hadn’t occurred to me while preparing for the project, and I ended up spending a significant amount of time hunting around the net for an appropriate sound recording. It didn’t help that I couldn’t get any sound out of my laptop either; I need a new one! The one we went with – simply called ‘Post Office’ – wasn’t ideal; it was a lot of echoey noise that was not really representative of the environment we were trying to emulate, but Slawek tweaked it a little bit, and put a few sound effects built in to his computer onto the track as well to make a fairly convincing backing track.

The mixing took a long time; Slawek unfortunately hadn’t heard what the scripts were supposed to sound like before we recorded them so we spent a lot of time working together to make sure all the lines were in the right order. It was a long and arduous process but one that was one hundred percent necessary. It turned out that we needed some extra time anyway just to finish it off and master it; I had no problem with this as we had worked very hard in the day and it was worth the extra money to walk away with something we could be certain was the finished product.

I must also give an honorary mention to another friend Sam Draisey, who wrote and performed the introductory music for the CD. It was certainly no worse than most of the tracks available online for the same money, better than many, and quite well written given the fact that my mind went blank every time he asked me what sort of artists he wanted the track to sound like. (For future reference, Massive Attack would be magnificent!)

We were delighted with how the CD turned out in the end; however there are always things you would do differently next time, so here are some developmental points for me for when we do another one:

More time to do the mixing would be my first priority. Whether that means booking the actors for less time, or booking the studio for more time, we need more time to use the material we have. When we recorded the actors we did about four or five takes of each track. The procedure then would be to choose the best bits of each track and use them in the final mix. That wasn’t really possible for a couple of reasons, time being an important one; we ended up using the first take for near enough all of them, and it was only when I happened to remember that they performed one or two lines better in the other takes that those takes got used. This is a shame because I do remember the actors performing generally better on some of the other takes. The knock-on effect of not having that backing track ready to begin with was not catastrophic but it did cost us. Because I spent most of the recording searching the net, I couldn’t be anywhere near as attentive while the actors were recording, so I couldn’t really be methodical in deciding which of the takes to use in the final mix; the first time I really listened to any of them was when we were mixing. There wouldn’t have been much we could have done anyway because of the time constraints, but it’s a step I would like to have taken.

Premise:
The August riots-a tragedy in their own right-have presented a golden opportunity to an ever-present mob of reactionary voices that all too easily fall into a time-worn, clichéd dialogue containing the following key words and phrases:
  • Back to basics
  • Respect
  • Discipline
  • Punishment
  • Do gooders
  • Trendy Teaching
I’m pretty sure you catch my drift!

Here’s some information gleaned from the Pimlico Academy-a transformed school that did a a few pretty straight forward things.
  1. They decided what they were there for and told everybody in six straight forward sentences.
  2. They set up a great pastoral system-a house system that worked well because it emphasised the importance of learning and behaviour and did something about it when things started to slip
  3. A strong tutorial system and after school support-access to specialist teachers and boosters
  4. A strong sense of corporate identity with a uniform-grants for families who were struggling to afford one.
  5. A Firm, Fair and Followed disciplinary system
  6. A rewards system that acknowledges an celebrates progress in behaviour.


Outcome :

The number of pupils achieving five A*-C grades at GCSE (including maths and English) was 60 per cent in 2010/11, up from 36 per cent in 2007/08.
At the end of the 2010/11 school year, attendance was 94.3 per cent for years 7 to 11, compared to 78.3 per cent in 2009/10.
Staff absenteeism has halved since the introduction of the new measures thanks to reduced stress and pressure on teachers.
In the first year that the rewards system was introduced, there were no permanent exclusions. The following year there was only one.
Prior to the rewards system, 50 to 60 pupils were sent out of lessons each day. Now it is fewer than 10 and they are normally sent out for less serious reasons than was previously the case. Overall there has been a huge change in the atmosphere in the school, maintains Holt: “The staff are happier, the students are happier and the school is basically a much nicer place to be.”
The above takes a little more thinking through the simplistic rantings of “Put the teacher back in charge” and it sits comfortably with my view-if you want respect you need to earn it-power and authority are given and received, not enforced and tolerated and, without consensus we’re nowhere.
This doesn’t mean that we “hand over control to the kids”-it means for me that life is far more subtle and nuanced than  ”Do as I say or else,” and the sooner we establish learning cultures that transmit those values, the better it will be for kids, their families and teachers and wider society.
We have, as part of our professional portfolio a considerable depth of experience working in schools and colleges on behaviour related issues. Our experience would bear out the key elements of the above and we are happy to discuss this here or by contacting us directly at enquiries@coadyconsultants.co.uk

Listen To Your Workforce!


Workforce Voices-The Value and Benefits of Listening

October 5, 2011 by coady1
Premise


Can listening to and engaging with a workforce make a positive contribution-we believe it can as long as it is honest, authentic and can show that a “difference for the better” has emerged. We also believe that this will work in any organisation-large or small-providing the process is well managed.


Here are 3 areas for consideration

  1. Principles
  2. Benefits
  3. Challenges



Principles of Listening to Workforce Voices:


o Mutual respect given and received between and within the workforce 
o All adults have equal worth in the workplace
o Communication is open, honest, valued and provides an exchange of ideas and views between workforce
o Investment in the future – accepting that all members of workforce are entitled to express their views about things which will affect and determine their future
o Meaningful active involvement where any decisions about workforce are made with them
o Working relationships are sustainable, effective and responsive
o Equal opportunities exist for workforce to be involved in a range of activities/development processes
o Workforce participation, involvement and voice are continually evaluated and reviewed.


Benefits of Listening to Workforce Voices:


o Gives additional information and insight into what the workforce thinks of structures/management etc
o Helps to strengthen partnerships between workforce and management
o Helps workforce members work out what is best for themselves and their colleagues
o Enables the workforce to gain better understanding of the things that really matter to colleagues
o Helps to create a listening environment
o All workforce members feel valued, respected and treated like equals
o Helps to develop reflective thinking 
o Increased confidence, self esteem and aspirations
o Enables the workforce to become more motivated to get involved in their jobs 
o Strengthens the feeling of community
o Develops teamwork
o Promotes more creative thinking
o Increases effective communication between workforce 


Challenges of Listening to Workforce Voices 


o Some of the workforce may be anxious about criticism of their work/leadership/communication skills
o Some of the workforce may be wary of the unpredictability of comments and views
o Some of the workforce may have reservations about voicing their opinions/blame culture
o Some of the workforce may worry about the loss of authority in their department
o Some of the workforce will not be prepared to accept the opinions of others
o Some of the workforce may use the opportunity to “take over” or dominate discussion areas
o Managing the initiative will call for careful planning/time constraints etc

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Listening and Acting On Workforce Voices

Premise


Can listening to and engaging with a workforce make a positive contribution-we believe it can as long as it is honest, authentic and can show that a "difference for the better" has emerged. We also believe that this will work in any organisation-large or small-providing the process is well managed.


Here are 3 areas for consideration

  1. Principles
  2. Benefits
  3. Challenges



Principles of Listening to Workforce Voices:


o Mutual respect given and received between and within the workforce 
o All adults have equal worth in the workplace
o Communication is open, honest, valued and provides an exchange of ideas and views between workforce
o Investment in the future – accepting that all members of workforce are entitled to express their views about things which will affect and determine their future
o Meaningful active involvement where any decisions about workforce are made with them
o Working relationships are sustainable, effective and responsive
o Equal opportunities exist for workforce to be involved in a range of activities/development processes
o Workforce participation, involvement and voice are continually evaluated and reviewed.


Benefits of Listening to Workforce Voices:


o Gives additional information and insight into what the workforce thinks of structures/management etc
o Helps to strengthen partnerships between workforce and management
o Helps workforce members work out what is best for themselves and their colleagues
o Enables the workforce to gain better understanding of the things that really matter to colleagues
o Helps to create a listening environment
o All workforce members feel valued, respected and treated like equals
o Helps to develop reflective thinking 
o Increased confidence, self esteem and aspirations
o Enables the workforce to become more motivated to get involved in their jobs 
o Strengthens the feeling of community
o Develops teamwork
o Promotes more creative thinking
o Increases effective communication between workforce 


Challenges of Listening to Workforce Voices 


o Some of the workforce may be anxious about criticism of their work/leadership/communication skills
o Some of the workforce may be wary of the unpredictability of comments and views
o Some of the workforce may have reservations about voicing their opinions/blame culture
o Some of the workforce may worry about the loss of authority in their department
o Some of the workforce will not be prepared to accept the opinions of others
o Some of the workforce may use the opportunity to “take over” or dominate discussion areas
o Managing the initiative will call for careful planning/time constraints etc

Sunday, October 2, 2011

It Is With Anger and Disbelief!!


The link takes you to an article published about a 16 years old girl called Dana. She had been
  • Sexually abused since she was 13
  • Groomed for abuse in a classic manner, by someone in authority and with credibility: someone she should have been able to trust
  • Removed from what is reported as a successful Foster Placement
  • Allocated multiple social workers (12 in 18 months)
  • Known to self-harm
  • Known to attempt suicide
  • Disbelieved
http://tinyurl.com/6dody59

I urge you to follow the link and read the story: whether you work directly with children, young people or vulnerable adults or not, take a couple of minutes and read not only what is said but (crucially), what is left unsaid.
We train professionals in Safeguarding and they are left in no doubt whatsoever as we deliver our programme-believe the child.
Dana found a friend in a trainee teacher who was told by the School’s Child Protection Officer that Dan was an attention seeker.
Without best guessing the outcome of the serious case review it seems that we are once again failing to protect the most vulnerable in spite of a series of what anyone, with the most basic awareness in Safeguarding would recognise as “classic indicators” of a potentially abusive or dangerous situation.
For the trainee teacher who Dana had befriended it is my hope that she/he is able to reconcile that they did the right thing and spoke to the right people: the responsibility for what transpired is shared elsewhere.